Dr Mohammad MF Siddiqui

Mr Donnelly acting as the Chair of the proceedings was bias and hypocrite in my honest opinion. There were many examples to justify this. I will highlight these in my subsequent postings but one below is one of many. Mr Donnelly was telling me off that I had been making statements. Readers can decide reading the following questions I asked; questions were simple and comprised of small sentences. At the bottom, he interrupted blaming, I keep making statements,. Q     Thank you.   How was the baby overnight? A     Overnight he was fine. Q     Could sleep? A     Yes. Q     Not kicking around too much or crying or ...? A     No. Q     When did you notice the ring in the nappy? A     I would say the second nappy change of that day.   The first nappy change was fine. Q     That day it was early night, you mean the following ...

Following is an excerpt from the transcript when I was about to notify the panel members about GMC's legal representative and MPTS legal assessor. In the morning of this day I was threatened by both of these legal representatives not to disclose a specific document in front of the panel members. Not heeding to their threats I was about to disclose this but was interrupted by both these legal representatives and they were asking to turn the recordings off etc. This is clearly visible in this piece of transcript. This is to show a true picture of these so called 'truthful' and self-proclaimed 'civilised' people. These people are criticising how the justice system is in other countries but this is how justice system is in this civilised country of honest and just people... A complete rubbish!!! MR SIDDIQUI:   I have to say something but I will be guided by Mr Donnelly. THE CHAIR:   Yes.   Mr Siddiqui, go ahead, please? MR SIDDIQUI:   Tha...

I was removed from the GMC register on the findings of dishonesty. One of the GMC's allegations was that I lied to Mrs D (mother of child D) about my conditions on GMC registration. In fact following was the wording of the GMC's condition on my registration: "you may only carry out circumcisions on hospital premises or within a Cara Quality Commission approved clinical setting" Following is transcript of mother's discourse in MPTS hearing during cross examination by Dr Siddiqui: Q     You said that we discussed about the restrictions probably?   You mentioned about the restrictions and the GMC on that phone call? A     Pardon, did I? Q    You mentioned about the restrictions on my GMC registration on that ‑‑‑ A     I did mention that I had noticed on that day that your registration on GMC had changed since the last time I checked in October, that there was a condition, I believe, on your registration, which I...

36. You failed to perform the procedure on 2 November 2013 to an adequate standard, in that the tie holding the Plastibell was not secured properly. 96.  The Panel heard evidence that you performed a Plastibell circumcision on Patient D and the Plastibell ring fell off the following day. Expert evidence was that the most probable reason for this happening was that you had not properly secured the ring with a tie. The Panel accepts this evidence and finds that you had not properly secured the tie. Consequently you had failed to perform the procedure to an adequate standard. The Panel finds this paragraph proved.  This expert statement of Mr Alizai was wrong. At the time, there was a document from Portland Hospital for Women and Children available on line, "SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION FOR THE BABY CIRCUMCISION CLINIC AT THE PORTLAND HOSPITAL". The surgeon performing circumcisions at this hospital was Mrs Patil. Mrs Patil acted as an expert in my case as well. Accord...

As said previously, this dishonest liar surgeon from Leeds General Infirmary should be struck off because of his lies in MPTS hearing in my honest opinion. Previously on this page, I have given few examples of Mr Alizai's dishonesty and telling lies. On this page, I will try to show another evidence of his dishonesty. During cross examination at MPTS hearing of my case, Mr Alizai was enquired by the panel members if my consenting process was valid. He replied that because I didn't listen to children's heart sounds therefore my consenting was invalid i.e. I didn't consent parents. He didn't produce any published literature to authenticate his lies. Off course, lies do not have any feet to stand upon. Following are a couple of consent forms. I hid the children details including parents' signatures. According to guidelines attached above, in the absence of any history of heart problems etc, there is no need to listen to heart sounds. Moreover, parents signe...

Following is another example of dishonesty on behalf of this liar surgeon from Leeds General Infirmary Leeds, in my honest opinion. He acknowledges working with Mr Siddiqui and still found no reason for conflict of interest or disclosure of conflict of interest.  This also gives a glimpse of dishonesty in GMC and MPTS rampant in these institutions, in my honest opinion . There are rules regarding conflict of interest and its disclosure in Good Medical Practice by GMC. But obviously some one working on GMC's agenda is not required to follow these rules, an utter disgusting sickening deceitfulness. 

In this post, I would try to highlight how corrupt organisations like General Medical Council and MPTS (GMC's kangaroo court) can violate and disregard their own rules in order to get their desired verdicts. Dishonest corrupt experts like Mr N Alizai, a pediatric surgeon in Leeds General Infirmary not only lied in his expert report (in my honest opinion) but disregarded the rules set out by GMC in Good Medical Practice. Strangely, GMC and MPTS (kangaroo court of GMC) also showed blatant disregard of their own rules. This was because Liar Mr Alizai was accomplishing their agenda to produce false reports (in my honest opinion).