Mr Mark Woodward, consultant pediatric urologist, Bristol Children Hospital
I have been labelled by MPTS panel as a callous doctor. Unfortunately, law and justice in this country can easily be manipulated by the authorities.
Mr Woodward, acting as professional witness, in my case, gave an inaccurate unprofessional advice to panel members. When he was asked by panel members how to perform re do plastibell circumcision, he didn't have a clue and his wrong statement was belied by the statement given by child's mother.
Mr Woodward should have been open and frank to tell the panel members that he had never performed plastibell circumcision in his life, not to mention of redo plastibell circumcision. Mr Woodward's understanding of redo circumcision meant cutting away more foreskin and therefore leaving less skin over penis i.e. possibility of requiring skin grafting over penis. Shame on him!!
Some one who never performed plastibell circumcision in his professional life and drawing wrong conclusions should be ashamed of his standing to come out and give professional statement in MPTS hearing. Such a disgraceful person!!
General Medical Council should have taken a suo moto notice but disgusting GMC is an axis of dishonesty and waste of public money.
The fact about this particular child was that parents never received correct advice from Bristol Children Hospital regarding aftercare. This is the hospital Mr Woodward worked at the time and therefore his statement was to hide his and his hospital's inadequate care to this child. Unfortunately parents of the child should have been informed of this.
Mr Woodward, acting as professional witness, in my case, gave an inaccurate unprofessional advice to panel members. When he was asked by panel members how to perform re do plastibell circumcision, he didn't have a clue and his wrong statement was belied by the statement given by child's mother.
Mr Woodward should have been open and frank to tell the panel members that he had never performed plastibell circumcision in his life, not to mention of redo plastibell circumcision. Mr Woodward's understanding of redo circumcision meant cutting away more foreskin and therefore leaving less skin over penis i.e. possibility of requiring skin grafting over penis. Shame on him!!
Some one who never performed plastibell circumcision in his professional life and drawing wrong conclusions should be ashamed of his standing to come out and give professional statement in MPTS hearing. Such a disgraceful person!!
General Medical Council should have taken a suo moto notice but disgusting GMC is an axis of dishonesty and waste of public money.
The fact about this particular child was that parents never received correct advice from Bristol Children Hospital regarding aftercare. This is the hospital Mr Woodward worked at the time and therefore his statement was to hide his and his hospital's inadequate care to this child. Unfortunately parents of the child should have been informed of this.
Comments
Post a Comment